Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Partition Actions: Determining Proper Reimbursement of Advanced Funds

Partition Actions: Determining Proper Reimbursement of Advanced Funds

Updated on September 17, 2018

In California, when our partition attorneys deal with accountings that accompany partition claims, it is very important to keep in mind how to distribute funds upon the sale of the partitioned property. Generally, a party who pays a disproportionate share of the property’s expenses is entitled to reimbursement for the amount the party paid in excess of its ownership interest.  Doing the math to determine how the reimbursement shall occur is important because depending on how the parties or the court does the math may vary the amount each party receives.  The California Court of Appeals dealt with this exact issue in Southern Adjustment Bureau v. Nelson (1964) 230 Cal.App.2d 539.

In Southern Adjustment Bureau  the Court of Appeals walked us through the relevant analysis as follows:

To illustrate: A and B each own an undivided one-half interest in Blackacre as tenants-in-common. A advances $2,000 for which he is entitled to contribution from B of $1,000. In an action for partition, the court orders Blackacre sold.

ALSO READ  Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act California

How should the proceeds be divided?

Possibility One:

Blackacre is sold for $10,000. A receives $2,000 (the total advancement). The residue of $8,000 is divided equally.

A receives $6,000.

B receives $4,000.

Possibility Two:

Blackacre is sold for $10,000. A receives $1,000 (B’s contribution to the advancement). The residue of $9,000 is divided equally.

A receives $5,500.

B receives $4,500.

Possibility Three:

Blackacre is sold for $10,000. The $10,000 is divided equally. A is given a lien of $1,000 on B’s share of $5,000.

A receives $6,000.

B receives $4,000.

These illustrations point out that the reimbursing cotenant receives a $500 advantage when the measure of contribution is determined by applying the formula suggested in possibility two, the method followed by the trial court. (1) When a cotenant makes advances from his own pocket to preserve the common estate, his investment in the property increases by the entire amount advanced. Upon sale of the estate he is entitled to be reimbursed his entire advancement before the balance is equally divided.   Id. at 541.

ALSO READ  Quiet Title v. Partition

Obviously, litigating and resolving partition actions requires knowledge of the intricacies of the relevant area of law to maximize the amount an owner can expect to receive by way of the sale of the property and the partition judgment.  Our Los Angeles based partition attorneys of experience litigating partition actions and resolving partition claims throughout Southern California. To see if you qualify for a free 30 minute consultation, contact us by filling out the contact box or at (310) 954-1877, or info@schorr-law.com.

See related: Procedure For Selling Property After a Partition by Sale Judgment

Areas We Serve in California:

Ventura County    -    San Bernardino County    -    San Diego County  -   Bakersfield Kern County   -  Orange County   -  San Luis Obispo County   -  Riverside County    -   The Rest of California

Scroll