We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Updated on November 13, 2024
We have been taking a lot of depositions lately and, in so doing, we have noticed a lot of improper coaching of witnesses during deposition by opposing counsel. This caused us to revisit the Los Angeles County Superior Court’s Rules Guidelines for Civility in Litigation.
In particular, Appendix 3.A provides:
(8) While a question is pending, counsel should not, through objections or otherwise, coach the deponent or suggest answers.
What does this mean? It means that when a lawyer asks a question the deponent (the person answering the question) must answer the question only subject to the deponent’s lawyer’s objection. The lawyer cannot take or break or attempt to go off the record while the question is pending. That is completely improper. The deponent must answer the question without any aid or help from his lawyer. The idea behind this rule is that the deponent should provide a truthful somewhat raw answer on the spot, not an answer crafted by the deponent’s lawyer.
The Los Angeles County rule seems settle any debate as to what is proper conduct at a deposition. There are several cases that discuss this issue throughout jurisdictions across the United States.
For example, the Federal Court of Appeals stated In Re Stratosphere Corporation, 182 F.R.D. 614 (D. Nev.1998),
“If they are requested by the deponent or deponent’s counsel, and the interrogating attorney is in the middle of a question, or is following a line of questions which should be completed, the break should be delayed until a question is answered or a line of questions has been given a reasonable time to be pursued. . .”
We tend to agree with this. It defeats the purpose of a deposition if the lawyer can interrupt and improperly coach a witness. At Schorr Law, our real estate attorneys have conducted literally hundreds of depositions and know exactly how important they are. For help with your real estate matter, contact us today.
P: (310) 954-1877 | Text: (310) 706-2265 |E: info@schorr-law.com | Send us a message using our easy Contact Form!
Ventura County - San Bernardino County - San Diego County - Bakersfield Kern County - Orange County - San Luis Obispo County - Riverside County - The Rest of California