We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Updated on August 15, 2017
A tenant’s bankruptcy or insolvency does not automatically terminate an unexpired lease of real property. It does not matter whether the lease expressly authorizes early termination in the case that the tenant becomes insolvent or bankrupt, because these types of lease clauses are unenforceable. [11 USC § 365(e); In re Cole (9th Cir. BAP 1998) 226 BR 647, 652.]
When a tenant files for bankruptcy this typically triggers an automatic stay of “the enforcement against the debtor or property of the estate of a judgment obtained before commencement of the bankruptcy case and “any act to obtain possession of property of the estate or of property from the estate . . .” [11 USC §§§ 362 (a)(1), 362 (a)(2), & 362 (a)(3).] Accordingly, as of the tenant’s filing of bankruptcy, the landlord cannot commence an unlawful detainer action, serve a three-day notice to quit, or take any further steps to prosecute a pending unlawful detainer. [Ibid.] Further, the master lessor cannot take action against a tenant sublessor if it would adversely affect the possessory rights of a subtenant debtor who filed the bankruptcy petition. [See In re 48th St. Steakhouse, Inc. (2d Cir. 1987) 835 F.2d 427, 430).]
There are two exceptions to the automatic stay related to residential unlawful detainers. First, the automatic stay does not stay eviction when an unlawful detainer judgment has been obtained before the tenant’s bankruptcy filing for residential property in which the tenant debtor resides as a tenant under the lease. [11 USC § 362 (b)(22).] Note, that this exception does not take effect for 30 days and is essentially a 30-day stay. [11 USC §§§ 362 (b)(22), 362 (l)(1), 362 (l)(5).] Second, the automatic stay does not apply to an eviction action seeking residential property where “the debtor resides as a tenant under a lease . . . based on endangerment of such property or the illegal use of controlled substances on [the] property . . . “ [11 USC § 362 (b)(23).] Further, this exception applies fifteen days after the landlord serves the required certification to the tenant. [11 USC § 362 (m)(1).]
For more information, contact Schorr Law, APC at (310) 954-1877 or info@schorr-law.com.
Ventura County - San Bernardino County - San Diego County - Bakersfield Kern County - Orange County - San Luis Obispo County - Riverside County - The Rest of California