We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Updated on August 16, 2017
Ordinarily, partners cannot sue each other for damages based on partnership business, at least not until there has been an action for dissolution and accounting. Malott v. Seymour (1950) 101.Cal.App.2d 245, 246. The general rule is particularly applicable to claims for damages arising out of a manner in which a partner has conducted partnership and to breaches of partnership agreements. The Court of Appeals, however, has ruled that the reason for applying this general rule are less forceful where the wrongful acts complained of are a breach of contract and a tort (a civil wrong). Indeed, one clear exception to the rule is an action for damages for a tort “of such a nature that it not only terminates the partnership but wrongfully destroys it, and where the erring partner converts to his own use its entire assets.” Barlow v. Collins (1958) 166 Cal. App. 2d 274, 278.
This in an interesting rule because it means that in many instances a partner who thinks that their partner has done wrong must make the difficult decision of choosing to force a dissolution of the partnership if they desire to take action on the wrong. This creates a fair number of issues to consider before rushing to sue a business partner for wrongdoing.
To inquire about a free consultation on your partnership dispute, contact our Los Angeles attorneys at (310) 954-1877 or email at info@schorr-law.com.
Ventura County - San Bernardino County - San Diego County - Bakersfield Kern County - Orange County - San Luis Obispo County - Riverside County - The Rest of California