We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Updated on February 26, 2022
When a person lives in, or even travels to California, he or she is governed by multiple sets of laws. For example, an incident occurring in Los Angeles County may give rise to claims under United States (“Federal”) law, California law, and/or one or more local municipal ordinances. Indeed, the interrelationship amongst the various laws derives its own complex and convoluted web of laws. However, potential clients often ask a simple question that has a relatively simple answer:
In California, can a person bring a claim under a Federal statute in State court? The simple answer is yes, with exceptions.
California courts are courts of “general jurisdiction” and have what is called “subject matter jurisdiction” over all categories of actions arising under State and Federal law. Generally, this means a California plaintiff may bring a claim under a Federal statute in State Court. For example, a plaintiff in California could bring a claim in State court against a defendant for a defendant’s violation of the Consumer Credit Protection Act. (Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th125.) Indeed, the Consumer Credit Protection Act is a Federal Statute.
However, there are limits to California courts’ subject matter jurisdiction over Federal laws. For example, a Federal Statute may expressly give the federal government exclusive jurisdiction over litigation related to the statute. In this event, if a plaintiff filed an action under such a statute, the plaintiff’s action would be susceptible to being thrown out of State court or removed to Federal court.
The California real estate attorneys at Schorr Law have years of experience litigating real estate cases in both State and Federal Court. To that end, the specific performance attorneys at Schorr Law will be able to analyze all applicable laws and help you find the correct venue for your real property action. Contact Schorr law for your free consultation today.
Also Read-
Ventura County - San Bernardino County - San Diego County - Bakersfield Kern County - Orange County - San Luis Obispo County - Riverside County - The Rest of California